<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Google Native Client is not a Flash competitor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jadbox.com/2008/12/why-google-native-client-is-not-a-flash-competitor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jadbox.com/2008/12/why-google-native-client-is-not-a-flash-competitor/</link>
	<description>Programming, Visualization and Game Development Theory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:20:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Detrus</title>
		<link>http://www.jadbox.com/2008/12/why-google-native-client-is-not-a-flash-competitor/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Detrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jadbox.com/?p=752#comment-272</guid>
		<description>But then, instead of making something like 100MB Quake which was made for CDs and the desktop, you make something that&#039;s internet friendly. So instead of loading all the textures as images, you procedurally generate them. Same can be done with music, sound and character animations.

NativeClient is a security system, so it&#039;s not a competitor to development frameworks like Flash or Unity3D, but O3D is.

Still the old frameworks can be made to work with NaCl and allow people to create modern applications, instead of applications from 15 years ago, with a few web connections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But then, instead of making something like 100MB Quake which was made for CDs and the desktop, you make something that&#8217;s internet friendly. So instead of loading all the textures as images, you procedurally generate them. Same can be done with music, sound and character animations.</p>
<p>NativeClient is a security system, so it&#8217;s not a competitor to development frameworks like Flash or Unity3D, but O3D is.</p>
<p>Still the old frameworks can be made to work with NaCl and allow people to create modern applications, instead of applications from 15 years ago, with a few web connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: localToGlobal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; news review -&#62; 8th week of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.jadbox.com/2008/12/why-google-native-client-is-not-a-flash-competitor/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>localToGlobal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; news review -&#62; 8th week of 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jadbox.com/?p=752#comment-127</guid>
		<description>[...] &gt; Why Google Native Client is not a Flash competitor &#124; JADBOX [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &gt; Why Google Native Client is not a Flash competitor | JADBOX [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

